Container Modifications:
This container showroom is converted from shipping container. Shipping containers have monocoque bodies. The corrugation panels (roof, sides, and back), floor, purlins, front doors, frame, and rails form an integrated structural skin. They are strong and made to carry floor loads far in excess of what is required for typical home construction. But, when we modify them, cutting holes or penetrating members, they are weakened. high level of modification the shipping container home design calls for, our structural engineer and architect will supply a professional plan.
As we said above, when cutting a shipping container or removing any of the paneling, it's structural integrity is compromised. As an extreme example, consider the removal of all a container's corrugated paneling along the length of one side (see the images below). Without reinforcement, the container deforms and then fails structurally. As a general rule, whenever remove portions of the panelized corrugation, steel framing will be required to frame out the opening. In addition, column and roof support will be necessary depending on the size of the opening(s) and roof/wind loads.
Steel cutting, framing, and welding is a large part of shipping container home design and construction. Typically, steel construction is not used much in single family or smaller home design because of expense. Cost of steel vs. wood/light gauge framing is substantial and the labor cost for steel vs. Carpentry is also higher. To combat this, much of the welding and reinforcing done off-site before setting the containers on site and starting the interior fit-out.
| Table I. Safety Factors on Land for Various Stack Heights on Land with Container Corner Post Capacity of 190,480 lbs (86,400 kg) |
| Number of Containers Stacked on One |
Total Height of Stack |
Safety Factor on Corner post loading |
| 8 |
9 |
1.80 |
| 9 |
10 |
1.60 |
| 10 |
11 |
1.44 |
| 11 |
12 |
1.31 |
| The table shows that we can stack 9-on-1 on land, and maintain a safety factor of greater than 1.5. |
| Table II. Stack Heights on Land forVarious Detector Densities with Container Corner Post Capacity of 214,290 lbs (97,400 kg) |
| Number of Containers Stacked on One |
Total Height of Stack (m) |
Safety Factor on Corner Post Loading |
| with payload density = 0.60 g/cc (22,150 kg gross) |
with payload density = 0.66 g/cc (24,000 kg gross) |
with payload density = 0.75 g/cc (27,150 kg gross) |
with payload density = 0.85 g/cc (30,480 kg gross) |
| 8 on 1 |
23.3 |
2.20 |
2.03 |
1.80 |
1.60 |
| 9 on 1 |
25.9 |
1.95 |
1.80 |
1.59 |
1.42 |
| 10 on 1 |
28.5 |
1.76 |
1.62 |
1.43 |
1.28 |
| 11 on 1 |
31.1 |
1.60 |
1.48 |
1.30 |
1.16 |
| Conclusion:Stacking ISO containers 10 high on land is reasonable, and stacks as high as 12 may be possible depending on the type of container purchased and on the loading of the container with Off-Axis detector elements. For a final detector design, good engineering practice would require that the corner posts of the selected containers be loaded to failure to more accurately determine the safety factor of the stacked array. |
){kind=link}